Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Mais filtros










Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Neurology ; 84(15): 1582-91, 2015 Apr 14.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25795646

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: To assess long-term safety and efficacy of fingolimod in patients with relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis (RRMS). METHODS: Patients completing FTY720 Research Evaluating Effects of Daily Oral Therapy in MS (FREEDOMS) were eligible for this dose-blinded, parallel-group extension study, continuing fingolimod 0.5 mg/day or 1.25 mg/day, or switching from placebo to either dose, randomized 1:1. Efficacy variables included annualized relapse rate (ARR), brain volume loss (BVL), and confirmed disability progression (CDP). Between-group analyses were conducted in the intent-to-treat (ITT) population from FREEDOMS baseline to end of study. Within-group analyses compared years 0-2 (FREEDOMS) and years 2-4 (extension) in the extension ITT population. RESULTS: Of 1,272 patients (FREEDOMS ITT population), 1,033 were eligible, and 920 enrolled in the extension study (continuous-fingolimod: 0.5 mg [n = 331], 1.25 mg [n = 289]; placebo-fingolimod: 0.5 mg [n = 155], 1.25 mg [n = 145]); 916 formed the extension ITT population (n = 330; n = 287; n = 154; n = 145) and 773 (84%) completed. In the continuous-fingolimod groups, ARR was lower (p < 0.0001), BVL was reduced (p < 0.05), and proportionately more patients were free from 3-month CDP (p < 0.05) than in a group comprising all placebo-fingolimod patients. Within each placebo-fingolimod group, ARR was lower (p < 0.001, both) and BVL was reduced after switching (p < 0.01, placebo-fingolimod 0.5 mg). Rates and types of adverse events were similar across groups; no new safety issues were reported. CONCLUSION: Efficacy benefits of fingolimod during FREEDOMS were sustained during the extension; ARR and BVL were reduced after switching. CLASSIFICATION OF EVIDENCE: This study provides Class IV evidence that long-term fingolimod treatment is well-tolerated and reduces relapse rates, disability progression, and MRI effects in patients with RRMS.


Assuntos
Encéfalo/patologia , Progressão da Doença , Imunossupressores/administração & dosagem , Imunossupressores/farmacologia , Esclerose Múltipla Recidivante-Remitente/tratamento farmacológico , Propilenoglicóis/administração & dosagem , Propilenoglicóis/farmacologia , Esfingosina/análogos & derivados , Adolescente , Adulto , Avaliação da Deficiência , Feminino , Cloridrato de Fingolimode , Humanos , Imunossupressores/efeitos adversos , Imageamento por Ressonância Magnética , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Esclerose Múltipla Recidivante-Remitente/patologia , Esclerose Múltipla Recidivante-Remitente/fisiopatologia , Propilenoglicóis/efeitos adversos , Recidiva , Método Simples-Cego , Esfingosina/administração & dosagem , Esfingosina/efeitos adversos , Esfingosina/farmacologia , Resultado do Tratamento , Adulto Jovem
2.
J Hypertens ; 31(5): 993-1000, 2013 May.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23511339

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate a dose-dependent reduction in blood pressure (BP) and overall safety of valsartan in hypertensive children. METHOD: In a multicenter, randomized, double-blind, parallel-group study, 75 patients with a documented history of hypertension were randomized (2 : 1 : 2) to receive valsartan (0.25, 1 or 4  mg/kg per day) for 6 weeks, then rerandomized (1 : 1) to receive placebo or valsartan for 2 weeks. This followed the 18-week extension study in which all patients received open-label valsartan (1  mg/kg initial dose, titratable up to 4  mg/kg). The primary endpoint was the slope analysis of the dose-response curve for mean sitting SBP (MSSBP) derived through MSSBP reduction over the first 6 weeks. Safety was assessed in terms of adverse events and serious adverse events (SAEs). RESULTS: At Week 6, significant reductions in MSSBP (P < 0.05) from baseline were observed for all three valsartan doses. Greater reductions were observed with the medium and high doses, although the dose-response trend was not statistically significant (P = 0.099). At Week 8, a greater increase in BP was observed in patients who switched from valsartan to placebo; the difference was not significant. At the extension endpoint, MSSBP was comparable to that observed at Week 6 of the core study. Overall, valsartan was well tolerated with no dose-dependent increase in adverse events during the dose-ranging period (Week 0-6) and a comparable incidence of adverse events to placebo during the placebo withdrawal period (Week 7-8). CONCLUSION: Although a dose-response trend was observed, statistical significance was not achieved during the dose ranging (primary endpoint) or the placebo-withdrawal periods of the study. However, valsartan demonstrated significant reductions in BP compared with baseline and provided consistent reductions over 26 weeks.


Assuntos
Bloqueadores do Receptor Tipo 1 de Angiotensina II/uso terapêutico , Anti-Hipertensivos/uso terapêutico , Hipertensão/tratamento farmacológico , Tetrazóis/uso terapêutico , Valina/análogos & derivados , Pré-Escolar , Método Duplo-Cego , Feminino , Humanos , Lactente , Masculino , Tetrazóis/efeitos adversos , Valina/efeitos adversos , Valina/uso terapêutico , Valsartana
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...